Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 21

Memorandum Opinion and Order: The 20 report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 5/31/2011. (S,L)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Carlos F. Ramos, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:10 CV 00940 JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff Carlos F. Ramos applications for a Period of Disability, Disability Insurance Benefits, and Supplemental Security Income in the above-captioned case. Ramos sought judicial review of the Commissioner's decision, and the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Greg White for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rules 72.2(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation (ECF No. 20) suggesting that the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after service. No objections have been filed within the 14-day period. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, (1:10 CV 00940) 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. May 31, 2011 Date /s/ Benita Y. Pearson United States District Court Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?