Cochran v. State of Ohio et al
Filing
17
Memorandum Opinion: The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation 16 and adopts the same. Accordingly, the petition is denied. Judge Sara Lioi on 8/31/2011. (P,J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
ROBERT COCHRAN,
PETITIONER,
vs.
BENNY KELLY, Warden,
RESPONDENT.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:10CV1338
JUDGE SARA LIOI
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in the
above-entitled action. Under the relevant statute:
[. . .] Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party
may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and
recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court
shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or
specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection
is made.
28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C). In this case, the fourteen-day period has elapsed and no objections have
been filed. The failure to file written objections to a Magistrate Judge=s report and recommendation
constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the
report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff=d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see United States
v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge=s report and recommendation and
adopts the same. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 31, 2011
HONORABLE SARA LIOI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?