Kliemann v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Filing
19
Memorandum Opinion and Order adopting the re 18 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Judge John R. Adams on 8/18/11. (K,C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
TED KLIEMANN
Plaintiff,
-vs-
,
COMMISSION
OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1588
JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
AND ORDER
The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance
benefits. Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision, and this Court referred
the case to the Magistrate Judge for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1).
The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and
recommendation recommending that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision. Doc 18.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation
within 14 days after service. Plaintiff did not file any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report
and recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient
use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v.
Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638
F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted.
The Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits is
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 18, 2011
/s/ John R. Adams_______________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?