De Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
Memorandum Opinion and Order adopting the re 18 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and reversing the decision of the Commissioner. The casue is remanded for further proceedings. Judge John R. Adams on 7/31/12. (K,C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
FELICITA DE NUNEZ,
Plaintiff,
-vsCOMMISSIONER
OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Defendant.
) CASE NO. 1:11CV2285
)
) JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS
)
)
) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
) AND ORDER
)
)
)
The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff’s application for a period of
disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income. Plaintiff sought
judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision, and this Court referred the case to the Magistrate
Judge for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local
Rules 72.2(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation (Doc. 18)
recommending that the Court reverse the Commissioner’s decision and remand the matter.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation
within fourteen (14) days after service. Defendant has filed a notice that he does not intend to
object to the Magistrate’s report and recommendation. Any further review by this Court would
be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d
813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991);
United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Accordingly, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted.
The Commissioner’s decision denying benefits is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED
for further consideration.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 31, 2012
/s/ John R. Adams_______________
JOHN R. ADAMS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?