MRI Software LLC v. Lynx Systems Inc.

Filing 302

Opinion and Order. The Court finds that under the unambiguous provisions of Section 10.7 of the 2002 Agreement, the one-year limitation clause is not absurd and is enforceable. The Court further finds it applies to both claims and counterclaims. Opinion to follow. The Court denies both Motions for Sanctions (Related doc #'s #180 , #188 ) and corresponding Motions in Limine (Related doc #'s #249 , #255 ) regarding MRI's failure to timely produce the five source codes and spreadsheet. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/23/2016. (H,CM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

MRI SOFTWARE, LLC.,
Plaintiff,
Vs.
LYNX SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.1:12CV1082
JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

OPINION AND ORDER

CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, J:
In light of the Motions, Briefs, Replies and oral arguments the Court, upon
reconsideration, finds that under the unambiguous provisions of Section 10.7 of the 2002
Agreement, the one-year limitation clause is not absurd and is enforceable. The Court further
finds it applies to both claims and counterclaims. Opinion to follow.
The Court further denies both Motions for Sanctions and corresponding Motions in
Limine regarding MRI’s failure to timely produce the five source codes and spreadsheet.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Christopher A. Boyko
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO
United States District Judge
Dated: November 23, 2016