Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

Memorandum of Opinion and Order Adopting Report and Recommendation re 17 in its entirety and dismissing case. Judge Dan A. Polster (C,KA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KANONIE HALL, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOC. SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:12 CV 2193 Judge Dan Aaron Polster MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER On August 28, 2012, Plaintiff Kanonie Hall, representing himself, filed a complaint seeking judicial review of the final decision of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying his applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”). (Doc #: 1.) On July 2, 2013, the Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred issued a Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner because the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. (Doc #: 17.) Both before and after the R&R issued, Mr. Hall, an ex-convict who has battled drug addiction, filed numerous Motions to Expedite Payment of SSI to which he believes he is entitled – and to which the Commissioner has not responded. (Doc ##: 15, 16, 18, 20.) On July 17, 2013, he filed an objection to the R&R which, for the most part, is nonsensical. (Doc #: 22.) Finally, on July 19, he filed a motion to withdraw all motions, filings and claims because he “love[s] Jesus Christ.” (Doc #: 23.) The Court has reviewed the R&R which notes the Administrative Law Judge’s finding that Mr. Hall can perform medium work with certain limitations when he is sober. The Court agrees that this finding is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Mr. Hall’s withdrawn objections; ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety; and DISMISSES this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Dan A. Polster July 22, 2013 Dan Aaron Polster United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?