Russo v. Dental Express Middleburg Hts., Brian E. Jackson, D.D.S., LLC et al

Filing 20

Memorandum Opinion and Order Adopting 19 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Burke. The parties' stipulated dismissal will be approved. Signed by Judge David D. Dowd, Jr. on 4/18/2013. (M,De)

Download PDF
DOWD, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Robert Russo, Plaintiff, v. Dental Express, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 5:12 CV 2879 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Burke for general pretrial supervision. While under Magistrate Judge Burke’s supervision, this case was settled. Thereafter, the parties filed a proposed stipulation of dismissal with prejudice. ECF 18. Magistrate Judge Burke has recommended that the Court approve the stipulation and dismiss the case with prejudice. ECF 19. Under the relevant statute: [T] magistrate judge shall file [her] proposed findings and recommendations under subparagraph (B) with the court and a copy shall forthwith be mailed to all parties. Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). (5:12 CV 2879) No objections have been filed to Magistrate Judge Burke’s report and recommendation. The failure to file written objections to a Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and adopts the same. Accordingly, the parties’ stipulated dismissal will be approved. IT IS SO ORDERED. April 18, 2013 Date s/ David D. Dowd, Jr. David D. Dowd, Jr. U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?