Tackett v. Richland Correctional Institution Warden

Filing 12

Order Adopting 11 Report and Recommendation. Judge Jack Zouhary on 9/22/2015. (D,L)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Dale L. Tackett,

Case No. 1:14 CV 788
Petitioner,

ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

-vsJUDGE JACK ZOUHARY
Richland Correctional Institution Warden,
Respondent.

This Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s August 28, 2015 Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) (see Doc. 11). The R&R recommends this Court deny in part and dismiss in part Petitioner
Dale Tackett’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1).
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to an R&R within fourteen
(14) days of being served with the R&R. If a party timely objects, this Court reviews de novo the
portions of the R&R to which objections were made. If a party does not timely object, the party
waives de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir.
2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Tackett’s deadline for filing objections has passed, and this Court has received no requests for
extension. The R&R accurately states the facts and law. This Court adopts the R&R in full.
Tackett’s Petition (Doc. 1) is denied in part and dismissed in part.

This Court certifies,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith
and there is no basis to issue a Certificate of Appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Jack Zouhary
JACK ZOUHARY
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
September 22, 2015