Foy v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
40
Order. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Related doc # 39 ) of the Magistrate Judge, grants Plaintiff's Motion (Related doc # 36 ) and authorizes attorneys fees in the amount of $21,134.50 to be paid out of Plaintiff's past due benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/27/2018. (H,CM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
JOHN B. FOY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:14cv907
JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, J:
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Limbert’s Report and
Recommendation (ECF DKT #39) to grant Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney Fees under the
Equal Access to Justice Act. (ECF DKT #36). Defendant did not oppose Plaintiff’s Application
and Defendant has not filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides that objections to a report and
recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2).
Defendant has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that
Defendant is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this
Court would be duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v.
-1-
Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505, 506
(6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
grants Plaintiff’s Motion and authorizes attorneys fees in the amount of $21,134.50 to be paid
out of Plaintiff’s past due benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Christopher A. Boyko
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO
United States District Judge
Dated: November 27, 2018
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?