Thompson v. Citizens National Bancorp, Inc. et al
Filing
68
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/16/16. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants plaintiff's motion for joinder and denies defendants' request to dismiss plaintiff Amanda Thompson. (Related Docs. 59 , 61 , 62 , 64 , 65 , and 67 ) (D,MA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
------------------------------------------------------:
AMANDA THOMPSON,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
CITIZENS NATIONAL BANCORP, INC., :
et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
:
-------------------------------------------------------
Case. No. 1:14-CV-1197
OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Docs. 59, 61, 62, 64, 65, 67]
JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
On June 3, 2014, Plaintiff Amanda Thompson filed a complaint against Defendants
Citizens National Bank (“CNB”), Skidmore “Camm” Garrett, and Philip Bethune.1
On June 27, 2016, Defendants CNB and Garrett moved for summary judgment.2
Defendants then filed a motion to supplement their summary judgment motion.3 Defendants
argue that because Plaintiff failed to disclose this lawsuit in her bankruptcy proceeding, it should
be dismissed.4 Alternatively, Defendants want the Court to substitute the bankruptcy trustee
Marvin A. Sicherman for Plaintiff Thompson.5 Plaintiff opposes Defendants’ supplementary
arguments,6 and has moved to join the trustee as a plaintiff in this case.7
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(a)(3), courts “may not dismiss an action for
failure to prosecute in the name of the real party in interest until, after an objection, a reasonable
1
Doc. 1. Philip Bethune is no longer a defendant in the case. Doc. 21.
Doc. 44.
3
Doc. 59. Brief in Support. Doc. 60.
4
Id. at 1.
5
Id.
6
Doc. 61. Defendants replied. Doc. 65.
7
Doc. 62. Defendants opposes. Doc. 64. Plaintiff replied. Doc. 67.
2
Case No.14-cv-1197
Gwin, J.
time has been allowed for the real party in interest to ratify, join, or be substituted into the
action.”8
This Court finds that Trustee Sicherman has been properly joined. The parties agree that
the trustee is a real party in interest in this case.9 Plaintiff Thompson moved to join the trustee
within 10 days of Defendants’ objection to the trustee’s absence. Plaintiff’s motion was made
within a reasonable time. Thus, joinder is appropriate.
The Court also finds that Plaintiff Thompson remains a real party in interest. Although the
trustee generally has the right to pursue a debtor’s causes of action,10 it appears that the trustee has
returned a portion of that right to Plaintiff Thompson.11 Defendants cite to two out of circuit cases
in arguing that Plaintiff Thompson cannot remain in the case. 12 Neither applies here.13
For the reasons above, this Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for joinder and DENIES
Defendants’ request to dismiss Plaintiff Thompson.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 16, 2016
s/
James S. Gwin
JAMES S. GWIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
Fed. R. Civ. P. 17; see also Knight v. New Farmers Nat. Bank, 946 F.2d 895 (6th Cir. 1991).
Doc. 62 at 1; Doc. 60 at 2.
10
Bauer v. Commerce Union Bank, Clarksville, Tennessee, 859 F.2d 438, 441 (6th Cir. 1988) (citing Jefferson v.
Mississippi Gulf Coast YMCA, 73 B.R. 179, 181–82 (S.D.Miss.1986)).
11
See In re Thompson, 14-BR-15948 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio), Doc. 83 (entitling Plaintiff Thompson to one-third of the
recovery in this case).
12
See Farrell Const. Co. v. Jefferson Parish, La., 896 F.2d 136, 140 (5th Cir. 1990); Wieburg v.
GTE Southwest Inc., 272 F.3d 302, 307 (5th Cir. 2001).
13
The issue in Farrell—whether a subcontractor could participate in a suit brought by a general contractor—is not
relevant here. Wieburg is factually similar to this case. However, in that case, the court was concerned that after
granting debtor the right to pursue her claim, the trustee might still be able to later bring the same claim against the
defendant. Such a scenario would violate the “fundamental purpose of Rule 17(a)—assuring [defendant] that res
judicata will protect it.” Id. at 307. Here, with both Thompson and the trustee as plaintiffs, the Court has no such
concern.
9
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?