Orozco-Valenzuela v. Holder et al

Filing 24

Order Adopting 23 the Report and Recommendation and dismissing 1 the Petition. Judge Jack Zouhary on 4/6/2015. (D,L)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Elio Amir Orozco-Valenzuela,
Petitioner,

Case No. 1:14 CV 1669
ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

-vsJUDGE JACK ZOUHARY
Eric H. Holder, Jr., as Attorney General,
Respondent.
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge
filed March 18, 2015 (Doc. 23). The R&R recommends this Court dismiss Petitioner’s Petition filed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s
proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at
which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which
objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute
constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d
976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Petitioner’s deadline for filing objections has passed, and no requests for extension have been
received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety.
Accordingly, this Court dismisses the Petition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Jack Zouhary
JACK ZOUHARY
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
April 6, 2015