Murphy v. Sloan
Filing
23
Memorandum Opinion: The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation and accepts the same. (Doc. No. 22 .) Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the case is dismissed. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. Sections 1915(a)(3), 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).(Related Doc # 1 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 11/23/2015. (P,J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER MURPHY,
PETITIONER,
vs.
BRIGHAM SLOAN, Warden,
RESPONDENT.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-2445
JUDGE SARA LIOI
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before the Court is the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in the
above-entitled action. Under the relevant statute:
Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file
written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by
rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those
portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which
objection is made. [. . .]
28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C).
The R&R was filed on October 27, 2015. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(d), an additional
three days are added when computing service. Therefore, objections were due by Friday,
November 13, 2015.
No objections were filed on or before that deadline. The failure to file written
objections to a Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a de novo
determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813
(6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986); see United States
v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation and
accepts the same. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the case is
dismissed. Further, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good
faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. §§
1915(a)(3), 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 23, 2015
HONORABLE SARA LIOI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?