Barnett v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Court reverses the decision of the Commissioner and remands this matter for further proceedings consistent with the parties' Proposed Stipulation. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 8/6/2015. (D,I)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
BENJAMIN J. BARNETT,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:15-CV-173

MAGISTRATE JUDGE
KATHLEEN BURKE

MEMORANDUM
OPINION AND ORDER

On August 4, 2015, the parties filed an Amended Proposed Stipulation to Remand under
Sentence Four of Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), wherein they
request that the Court enter judgment remanding the case for further proceedings. Doc. 20. The
parties stipulate that:
Upon remand, the Administrative Law Judge will give further consideration to all of the
medical opinion evidence pursuant to the provisions of 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1527 and
416.927 and Social Security Rulings 96-2p, 96-5p, and 96-6p, and explain the weight
given to such opinion evidence; further consider the claimant’s maximum residual
functional capacity, with specific reference to the opinion evidence of record (20 C.F.R. §
404.1545 and Social Security Rulings 85-16 and 96-8p); and, if warranted, obtain
supplemental evidence from a vocational expert (20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1565, 416.966 and
Social Security Ruling 00-4p).
Doc. 20, pp. 1-2.
Upon consideration of the parties’ Proposed Stipulation, the Court hereby reverses the
decision of the Commissioner and remands this matter for further proceedings consistent with
the parties’ Proposed Stipulation.

Dated: August 6, 2015

____________________________________
Kathleen B. Burke
United States Magistrate Judge