Manni Muhammad Rahman v. Grafton Correctional Institution et al

Filing 25

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation re 24 denying 22 Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Manni Muhammad Rahman. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 8/16/2016. (R,D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MANNI MUHAMMAD RAHMAN, Plaintiff, vs. GRAFTON CORRECTIONAL, INSTITUTION, et al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:15CV233 JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO ORDER This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc.#24) of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc.# 22) be denied. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Plaintiff has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Plaintiff is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981). Therefore, the Court adopts in full the Report and Recommendation (Doc.# 24) and denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8/16/2016 S/Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?