Krepps v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

Memorandum Opinion and Order reversing the decision of the Commissioner and remanding this matter for further proceedings consistent with the parties' Joint Motion to Remand (Doc. 20 ). Defendant's prior Motion to Remand (Doc. 18 ) is denied as moot. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 10/19/2015.(D,I)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO JAMES C. KREPPS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:15-CV-293 MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN BURKE MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On October 16, 2015, the Defendant filed a Joint Motion to Remand under Sentence Four of Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), wherein she requests that the Court remand to the agency for further administrative proceedings and a new decision. Doc. 20. The parties stipulate that: The entire prior decision will be vacated, and all pertinent issues will be considered de novo. Upon receipt of the Court’s order, the Appeals Council will remand the matter to an administrative law judge for a new hearing and a new decision, with specific instruction to the administrative law judge to reevaluate the opinions from the treating and non-examining sources and explain the weight given; reassess the claimant’s residual functional capacity; and if warranted, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert to clarify the effect of the reassessed limitations on the claimant’s occupational base. Doc. 20, pp. 1-2. Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion, the Court hereby reverses the decision of the Commissioner and remands this matter for further proceedings consistent with the parties’ Joint Motion (Doc. 20). Accordingly, Defendant’s prior Motion to Remand (Doc. 18) is denied as moot. Dated: October 19, 2015 ____________________________________ Kathleen B. Burke United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?