Johnson v. Hazou et al

Filing 32

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation re 31 granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment and Order of Case Dismissal. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/6/2017. (R,D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GERMANEY JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs) ) POLICE OFFICER ZAKI HAZOU, et al.,) ) Defendants. ) ) ) CASE NO.1:15CV1811 JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO ORDER On September 4, 2015, Plaintiff filed a pro se Section 1983 Complaint. (Dkt. #1). The case was referred to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. Defendants’ filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on August 19, 2016. On February 13, 2017, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and judgment rendered in Defendants’ favor. (Dkt.#31). FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Plaintiff has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Plaintiff is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981). Therefore, Magistrate Judge Ruiz’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/6/2017 S/Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?