Moon v. Miller
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation 12 , Order of Case Dismissal, dismissing in part and denying in part Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C Section 2254. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. §2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 1/11/2017. (R,D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
CASE NO. 1:15CV1972
JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO
On September 24, 2015, Petitioner filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Dkt. #1). The case was referred to Magistrate
Judge William H. Baughman, Jr., pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. On December 20,
2016, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Petitioner’s application for habeas
corpus be dismissed in part and denied in part. (Dkt. # 12).
FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a Report and
Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Petitioner has
failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that
Petitioner is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further
review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited
resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985);
Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991);
United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981).
Therefore, Magistrate Judge Baughman’s Report and Recommendation is
ADOPTED and Petitioner’s Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt.#1) is DISMISSED IN PART
AND DENIED IN PART.
Furthermore, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an
appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis
upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. §2253(c); Fed. R. App.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Christopher A. Boyko
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?