Black v. Sloan
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/29/16 granting the petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The Court further certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. (D,MA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
CASE NO. 1:16 CV 173
JUDGE JAMES S. GWIN
OPINION AND ORDER
On January 25, 2016, petitioner pro se Chardon Black, an inmate at the Lake Erie
Correctional Institution, filed the above-captioned in forma pauperis petition for writ of habeas
corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition challenges Black’s convictions, pursuant to a guilty
plea, for felonious assault and domestic violence. For the reasons stated below, the petition is
denied and this action is dismissed.
A federal court may entertain a habeas petition filed by a person in state custody only on
the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United
States. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). In addition, petitioner must have exhausted all available state
remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b).
As grounds for the petition, Black asserts: 1) his guilty plea was not voluntary, knowing
and intelligent; 2) he was denied a speedy trial; 3) his trial counsel was ineffective; 4) he was
subjected to double jeopardy; and 5) his sentence violated due process. It is apparent on the face
of the petition that Black has an action pending in the Ohio Court of Appeals in which he raises
the issues sought to raised as grounds herein. Therefore, without regard to the potential merits of
those grounds, Black has not yet exhausted his state court remedies. The petition is thus
Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and this action is
dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.
Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision
could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of
appealability. Fed.R.App.P. 22(b); 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 29, 2016
s/ James S. Gwin
JAMES S. GWIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?