Courtney v. City of Cleveland, et al.
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying plaintiff's Motion for reconsideration 24 . Defendant's motion to strike 25 is granted in part. Judge Donald C. Nugent 8/11/2017(C,KA)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
CITY OF CLEVELAND., et al.,
CASE NO. 1:16 CV 578
JUDGE DONALD C. NUGENT
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff, Carrington Courtney’s Motion for
Reconsideration and Written Opposition to Grant of Summary Judgement, (ECF “24), as well as
Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF #25).
The Court set an expedited briefing schedule for dispositive motions at a January 3, 2017
status conference. (ECF #20). Plaintiff made no appearance at that status conference.
Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on March 17, 2017. (ECF #19). The
Response was originally due on March 20, 2017. (ECF #20). No response was filed. At the
next status conference on April 10, 2017, the Plaintiff was given the opportunity to extend the
response time, and his counsel represented that no written response would be filed. He chose,
instead, to rely on the pleadings in the file. (ECF #21). The Court ruled on the Summary
Judgment motion just over a month later, on June 28, 2017. (ECF #22). At no time in between
did Plaintiff seek to file a response to the Summary Judgment motion.
On July 5, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Motion to Reconsider and “written opposition” to the
Summary Judgment Order. (ECF #24). To the extent that this two page document purports to be
a written opposition to the Summary Judgment motion, it is stricken as untimely. To the extent
that it is a Motion to Reconsider the Court’s prior opinion, it is DENIED. There is nothing in
this document that would justify reconsideration of this Court’s prior opinion. Defendant’s
Motion to Strike, (ECF #25), is GRANTED in part, and Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider, (ECF
#24), is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Donald C. Nugent
Donald C. Nugent
United States District Judge
August 11, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?