Flight Options, LLC et al v. Local 1108 International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al
Filing
51
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/28/16 setting an injunction bond in the amount of $125,000.00 for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 45 ) (D,MA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
_____________________________________
FLIGHT OPTIONS, LLC and
FLEXJET, LLC,
Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants,
v.
No. 1:16-CV-00732
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
TEAMSTERS, LOCAL 1108; INTERNATIONAL
BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS; and
BROTHERHOOD OF
TEAMSTERS, AIRLINE DIVISION,
OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. 45]
Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs.
______________________________________
JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
On April 22, 2016, Counter-Plaintiffs International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al.
(“Pilots Union”) filed a motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order
against Counter-Defendants Flight Options, et al. (“Carriers”).1 On May 25, 2016, this Court
granted Pilots Union’s preliminary injunction.2 In granting Counter-Plaintiffs’ counterclaim, the
Court ordered Carriers to accept the integrated seniority list, rescind the voluntary separation
package, and bargain in good faith with Counter-Plaintiffs.3
On June 8, 2016, Counter-Defendants Carriers filed an appeal from this Court’s order to
the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.4 On September 14, 2016, Counter-Plaintiffs Pilots Union
filed a motion for an injunction bond pending the court of appeal’s decision on whether this
Court properly issued the preliminary injunction.5
1
Doc. 10. Counter-Defendants opposed. Doc. 13. Counter-Plaintiffs replied Doc. 18.
Doc. 33.
3
Id. at 17.
4
Doc. 40. Counter-Defendants’ appeal is now pending before the Sixth Circuit.
5
Doc. 45. The Pilots Union request bond out of caution because Carriers have argued on appeal that this Court erred
by failing to set bond under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c) and the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S.C. § 107(e). Doc. 45-1 at 1.
2
Case No.16-CV-732
Gwin, J.
On October 19, 2016, the Court asked that the parties file position papers on the
appropriate bond. The parties each filed proposals.6 Counter-Plaintiffs Pilots Union requests that
bond be set at no more than $50,000.7 Counter-Defendants Carriers request $150,000.8
“[T]he amount of a security bond rests in the sound discretion of the district court.”9
Federal Rule of Civil Procedures 65(c) and the Norris-LaGuardia Act inform imposition of bond
in this case. Under the Federal Rules, “[t]he court may issue a preliminary injunction or a
temporary restraining order only if the movant gives security in an amount that the court
considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been
wrongfully enjoined or restrained.”
The Norris-LaGuardia Act provides:
No temporary restraining order or temporary injunction
shall be issued except on condition that complainant shall first file
an undertaking with adequate security in an amount to be fixed by
the court sufficient to recompense those enjoined for any loss,
expense, or damage caused by the improvident or erroneous
issuance of such order or injunction, including all reasonable costs
(together with a reasonable attorney’s fee) and expense of defense
against the order or against the granting of any injunctive relief
sought in the same proceeding and subsequently denied by the
court.10
The Carriers fail to present evidence of any expenses directly associated with the actions
the Court ordered Carriers to take in its preliminary injunction order. The Carriers do not allege
any losses associated with the order to bargain with the Union, and admit that any damages
arising from accepting the integrated seniority list “are too speculative . . . to provide a concrete
6
Counter-Plaintiffs, Doc. 50. Counter-Defendants, Doc. 49.
Doc. 50 at 1.
8
Doc. 49 at 3.
9
Div. No. 1, Detroit, Bhd. of Locomotive Engineers v. Consol. Rail Corp., 844 F.2d 1218, 1226 (6th Cir. 1988)
(citing Roth v. Bank of Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527 (6th Cir. 1978); Urbain v. Knapp Mfg. Co., 217 F.2d 810, 815
(6th Cir. 1954)).
10
29 U.S.C.A. § 107(e). The main distinction between Fed. Rule Civ. P. 26(c) and the Norris-LaGuardia Act is that
the latter requires the Court to consider attorney fees in setting bond.
7
2
Case No.16-CV-732
Gwin, J.
amount.”11 The Carriers posit that rescinding the voluntary separation package cost them
“approximately $50,000,” but admit that they “cannot state an exact number” and provide no
evidence for this estimate.12 Without more support, the Court declines to include the speculative
$50,000 loss in setting bond.
As for attorney fees and costs, the Carriers argue that they have spent $135,196.50 in
defense of Pilots Union’s preliminary injunction.13 The Carriers seek an injunction bond,
however, “of only $125,000 in combined attorney’s fees and costs.”14 However, the Plaintiff
Carriers filed this action seeking injunctive relief for the Carriers. The Carriers do not well
establish that the incurred attorney’s fees resulted from the Union’s responding effort to obtain
injunctive relief. Although $125,000 seems somewhat high, Carriers’ counsel has provided
adequate billing records to support their request.15
Accordingly, bond is set at $125,000.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 28, 2016
s/
James S. Gwin
JAMES S. GWIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
Doc. 49 at 4-5.
Id.
13
Doc. 49 at 5. This amount includes $134,576.00 in attorney fees and $620.50 for a copy of the preliminary
injunction hearing transcript. Id. at 6-7.
14
Id. at 7.
15
See Doc. 49-1 (affidavit of Counter-Defendant Carriers’ counsel); Doc. 49-3 (attorney billing records).
12
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?