Bell v. Young et al

Filing 22

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation 16 denying 12 Motion for reconsideration and to amend complaint. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 5/15/2017. (R,D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER BELL,
Plaintiff,
vs.

DAVID YOUNG, et al.,

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:16CV1135

JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO

ORDER

This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc.# 16) of
Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. regarding the Motion of Plaintiff for
Reconsideration and to Amend Complaint (Doc.#12). The Magistrate Judge
recommended that Petitioner’s Motion be denied.
FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a Report and Recommendation
must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Plaintiff has failed to timely file any
such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Plaintiff is satisfied with the
Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a
duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728
F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and
Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947
(6th Cir.1981).
Therefore, the Court adopts in full the Report and Recommendation (Doc.# 16)

and denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration and to Amend Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 5/15/2017

S/Christopher A. Boyko
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE