Bell v. Young et al

Filing 22

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation 16 denying 12 Motion for reconsideration and to amend complaint. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 5/15/2017. (R,D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER BELL, Plaintiff, vs. DAVID YOUNG, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:16CV1135 JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO ORDER This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc.# 16) of Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. regarding the Motion of Plaintiff for Reconsideration and to Amend Complaint (Doc.#12). The Magistrate Judge recommended that Petitioner’s Motion be denied. FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Plaintiff has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Plaintiff is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981). Therefore, the Court adopts in full the Report and Recommendation (Doc.# 16) and denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration and to Amend Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 5/15/2017 S/Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?