Jeans v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Memorandum Opinion and Order adopting Magistrate Judge Limbert's 18 Report and Recommendation. The final decision of the of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income is affirmed. Judge Sara Lioi on 5/30/17. (S,HR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
BONNIE L. JEANS,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-1211
JUDGE SARA LIOI
Before the Court is the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge George Limbert,
recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying
the application of plaintiff Bonnie L. Jeans (“plaintiff”) for Supplemental Security Income be
affirmed. (Doc. No. 18 (Report and Recommendation [“R&R”]).)
Under the relevant statute:
Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file
written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by
rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those
portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which
objection is made.
28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C).
The failure to file written objections to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge
constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report.
Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see United States v.
Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Plaintiff is represented by counsel. The time period for filing
objections has passed and no objections to the R&R have been filed.
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Limbert’s report and recommendation and adopts
the same. Accordingly, the final decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff’s application for
Supplemental Security Income is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 30, 2017
HONORABLE SARA LIOI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?