Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
Order: The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation and adopts the same. (Related Doc. No. 18 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 6/14/2017. (P,J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
MATTHEW S. JENKINS,
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-1322
JUDGE SARA LIOI
Before the Court is the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in the
above-entitled action. (Doc. No. 18.) The R&R was filed on May 31, 2017. On June 13, 2017,
plaintiff filed his notice that he “will not be filing objections to this Honorable Court’s Report and
Recommendation.” (Doc. No. 19.)1
The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation and adopts the
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 14, 2017
HONORABLE SARA LIOI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1):
Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections
to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court
shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or
recommendations to which objection is made. [. . .]
The failure to file written objections to a Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a de
novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984),
aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?