Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

Order: The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation and adopts the same. (Related Doc. No. 18 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 6/14/2017. (P,J)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MATTHEW S. JENKINS, PLAINTIFF, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, DEFENDANT. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:16-cv-1322 JUDGE SARA LIOI ORDER Before the Court is the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in the above-entitled action. (Doc. No. 18.) The R&R was filed on May 31, 2017. On June 13, 2017, plaintiff filed his notice that he “will not be filing objections to this Honorable Court’s Report and Recommendation.” (Doc. No. 19.)1 The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation and adopts the same. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 14, 2017 HONORABLE SARA LIOI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1): Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. [. . .] The failure to file written objections to a Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?