Irving v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

Order of Dismissal: The Magistrate Judge recommended affirming the defendant's final decision denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, finding it supported by substantial evidence. No objections having been heard, the Court adopts the recommendation and dismisses this matter with prejudice. (Related Doc. No. 18 ). Judge Sara Lioi on 6/30/2017. (P,J)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION REGINA IRVING, PLAINTIFF, vs. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT. CASE NO. 1:16-cv-1391 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGE SARA LIOI ORDER OF DISMISSAL Before the Court is the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in the above-entitled action. (Doc. No. 18.) Under the relevant statute: Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. [. . .] 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1). The R&R was filed on June 9, 2017. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(d), an additional three days are added when computing service, making objections due June 26, 2017, which fell on a Monday. No objections were filed on or before that deadline. The failure to file written objections to a Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The Magistrate Judge recommended affirming the defendant’s final decision denying plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, finding it supported by substantial evidence. No objections having been heard, the Court adopts the recommendation and dismisses this matter with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2017 HONORABLE SARA LIOI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?