Cross v. Commissioner of Social Security
Order that the the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 21 is hereby adopted. The decision of the administrative law judge is Affirmed, and the underlying matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Judge John R. Adams on 06/20/2017. (M,TL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
-vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-02003
JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance
benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff then sought judicial review of the
Commissioner’s decision, and the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas Parker for
preparation of a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rules
72.2(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation (Doc. 21) that this Court
AFFIRM the decision of the Commissioner.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation
within fourteen (14) days after service. On June 15, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a response to the
Report and Recommendation confirming that no objections would be filed. As such, any further
review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources.
Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932
F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted.
The decision of the administrative law judge is AFFIRMED, and the underlying matter is
DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 20, 2017
/s/ John R. Adams
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?