Murray v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Order that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 16 is hereby adopted. The decision of the administrative law judge is affirmed, and the underlying matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Judge John R. Adams on 06/20/2017. (M,TL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
-vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-2129
JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff’s application for Supplemental
Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act and for disability insurance benefits
under Title II of the Social Security Act in the above-captioned case. Plaintiff sought judicial
review of the Commissioner’s decision, and the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas
Parker for preparation of a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local
Rules 72.2(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge submitted a report and recommendation (Doc. 16) that
this Court AFFIRM the decision of the Commissioner.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation
within fourteen (14) days after service. To date, no objections have been filed. As such, any
further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited
resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human
Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted.
The decision of the administrative law judge is AFFIRMED, and the underlying matter is
DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 20, 2017
/s/ John R. Adams
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?