State of Ohio et al v Bey
Filing
3
Order of Remand signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/19/16 remanding this action to the Rocky River Municipal Court for the reasons set forth in this order. (D,MA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
------------------------------------------------------:
STATE OF OHIO, et al.,
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
vs.
:
:
KHADIJAH NIA BEY,
:
:
:
Defendant.
:
-------------------------------------------------------
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-2177
ORDER OF REMAND
JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
Pro se litigant Khadijah Nia Bey initiated this action by filing a “Legal Notice of
Removal” of a traffic case from Rocky River Municipal Court. (Doc. No. 1). Her Notice of
Removal is incomprehensible and does not set forth an intelligible basis for removal. She
appears to contend her rights have been violated in the Rocky River Municipal Court traffic
case, and she seeks monetary relief from the State of Ohio, the City of Rocky River, Rocky
River Municipal Court, and others involved in the traffic case.
This action must be remanded to the Rocky River Municipal Court. Under 28 U.S.C. §
1441(a), “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United
States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the
district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such
action is pending.” The party seeking removal bears the burden of demonstrating jurisdiction.
Eastman v. Marine Mech. Corp., 438 F.3d 544, 549–50 (6th Cir. 2006).
Nia Bey is attempting to remove a criminal traffic case, not a civil case, and the case is
not removable. A defendant may remove a criminal prosecution only in limited circumstances,
not established here. See 28 U.S.C. §1443.
Accordingly, this action is remanded to the Rocky River Municipal Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 19, 2016
s/
James S. Gwin
JAMES S. GWIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?