Dorazio v. Coulson et al
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation re 15 granting 10 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and Order of Case Dismissal. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 2/17/2017. (R,D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
CHARLES D. DORAZIO,
CHARLES E. COULSON, et al.,
CASE NO. 1:16CV2187
JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (Doc.#15) of
Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker regarding Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
(Doc.#10). In their Motion, Defendants argue that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim
upon which relief can be granted. The Magistrate Judge Recommends that the Motion
be granted, as Plaintiff has failed to state a violation of his substantive due process
rights. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation.
FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a Report and Recommendation
must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Plaintiff has failed to timely file any
such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Plaintiff is satisfied with the
Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a
duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728
F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and
Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947
Therefore, the Court adopts in full the Report and Recommendation (Doc.# 15)
and grants Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Christopher A. Boyko
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?