Wallace v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Filing
16
Memorandum of Opinion and Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 15 ) affirming the decision of the Commissioner. This matter is dismissed with prejudice. Judge John R. Adams on 7/28/17. (K,C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
VIRGINIA ANN WALLACE,
Plaintiff,
-vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-2246
JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
AND ORDER
The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff’s application for Child Disability
Insurance Benefits, a Period of Disability, and Supplemental Security Income under Titles II and
XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision,
and the case was referred to the Magistrate Judge for preparation of a Report and Recommendation
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rules 72.2(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge submitted a report
and recommendation (Doc. 16) that this Court AFFIRM the decision of the Commissioner.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a report and recommendation
within fourteen (14) days after service. To date, no objections have been filed. As such, any
further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited
resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human
Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir.
1981).
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted.
The decision of the administrative law judge is AFFIRMED, and the underlying matter is
DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 28, 2017
/s/ John R. Adams
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?