Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation 18 affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits, and dismiss the 1 Complaint. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/5/2017. (R,D)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
RICKEY R. TAYLOR,
-vsCommissioner of Social Security,
JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO
On November 7, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Complaint pursuant to Title 42
U.S.C. Section 405(g) (Dkt.#1). This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge
David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. On November 17, 2017, the
Magistrate Judge recommended affirming the Commissioner’s decision
denying Taylor ’s Application for a Period of Disability and Disability Insurance
Benefits. Plaintiff has not filed a response.
FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and
recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Plaintiff
has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume
that Plaintiff is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any
further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the
Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d,
474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932
F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981).
Therefore, Magistrate Judge Ruiz’ Report and Recommendation is
ADOPTED and the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed. Plaintiff’s Complaint is
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Christopher A. Boyko
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?