Jones v. Haviland

Filing 14

Order and Decision Adopting the Report and Recommendation re 13 of the Magistrate Judge. The petition is denied in its entirety. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Courts decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge John R. Adams on 9/27/18. (K,C)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GREGORY C. JONES, Petitioner, v. JAMES HAVILAND, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:16CV2892 JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS ORDER AND DECISION This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Petition of Gregory C. Jones (“Jones” or “Petitioner”) for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenburg issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in this matter on June 20, 2018. (Doc. 13.) The Court has examined the R&R, and finds it to be well-reasoned and thorough. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the R&R and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that petition is hereby DENIED in its entirety. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court’s decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: 9/27/2018 s/John R. Adams ___________ Judge John R. Adams UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?