Sherrills v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

Opinion and Order For the reasons stated in the Order, the Court denies Plaintiff's pending Motions (Doc ##: 8 , 11 and 15 ), overrules the Objection (Doc #: 17 ), and adopts the thorough and correct analysis of the record and the law articulated by the Magistrate Judge in the R & R (Doc #: 16 ). Signed by Judge Dan Aaron Polster on 4/18/2017. (K,K)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DARIES SHERRILLS, Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOC. SECURITY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:17 CV 30 JUDGE DAN AARON POLSTER OPINION AND ORDER This case is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg who recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc #: 8), Motion for Hearing on Default Judgment (Doc #: 11) and Motion to Strike Answer (Doc #: 15). (Doc #: 16 (“R & R”)). The Court has reviewed the Motions, the R & R, and Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc #: 17), and agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. It is undisputed that the Commissioner timely filed her Answer and Transcript on March 28, 2017, following two extensions of time granted by Magistrate Judge Greenberg. (See Doc #: 9 (first motion for extension) and non-document order of 3/14/2017 (granting motion); Doc #: 12 (second motion for extension) and non-document order of 3/28/2017 (granting motion)). Consequently, default judgment is not appropriate in this case. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s pending Motions (Doc ##: 8, 11 and 15), OVERRULES the Objection (Doc #: 17), and ADOPTS the thorough and correct analysis of the record and the law articulated by the Magistrate Judge in the R & R (Doc #: 16). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Dan A. Polster April 18, 2017 Dan Aaron Polster United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?