Hairston v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 12

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation re 11 dismissing 1 Complaint for failure to prosecute and Order of Case Dismissal. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 11/15/2017. (R,D)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SARAH L. HAIRSTON, Plaintiff, -vsCommissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.1:17CV151 ORDER JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO On January 20, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Complaint Pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) (Dkt.#1). This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. On October 26, 2017, the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing the case for failure to prosecute (Dkt. #11). Plaintiff has not filed an objection. FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Plaintiff has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Plaintiff is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981). Therefore, Magistrate Judge Ruiz’ Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the case is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:11/15/2017 S/Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?