Johnson-Hess v. Commissioner of Social Security
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting 16 the parties' Joint Motion for Remand. The Court remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the parties' Joint Motion, and enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 7/28/2017.(D,I)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
CHERYL ANN JOHNSON-HESS,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
CASE NO. 1:17-CV-262
OPINION AND ORDER
On July 28, 2017, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Remand under Sentence Four of
section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), wherein they request that the
Court remand the case for further proceedings and enter judgment. Doc. 16 (“Joint Motion”).
The parties stipulate that:
Upon remand, the Commissioner will vacate the findings in the Administrative Law
Judge’s decision, conduct a new hearing, and develop the administrative record as
necessary to determine anew whether Plaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the
Social Security Act. Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the ALJ to reevaluate the record medical opinions, re-evaluate the mental residual functioning
capacity, and issue a new decision.
Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Motion, the Court hereby grants the parties’ Joint
Motion, remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the parties’ Joint Motion, and
enters judgment in favor of Plaintiff.
Dated: July 28, 2017
Kathleen B. Burke
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?