Howell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation re 18 and Order of Case Dismissal. Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 1/24/2018. (R,D)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TAMMY H. HOWELL, Plaintiff, -vsCommissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17CV316 ORDER JUDGE CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO On February 16, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Complaint pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g) (Dkt.#5). This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge James R. Knepp, II, pursuant to Local Rule 72.2. On January 9, 2018, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings. (Dkt. #18). FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after service, but Plaintiff and Defendant have failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that both are satisfied with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981). Therefore, Magistrate Judge Knepp’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:1/24/2018 S/Christopher A. Boyko CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?