Conard v. Commissioner of Social Security
Memorandum Opinion and Order: granting 18 the parties' Amended Motion to Remand (Related Doc # 18 ). This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the parties' Motion and judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff. Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke on 8/25/2017.(D,I)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
DONTE MAURICE CONARD,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
CASE NO. 1:17-CV-524
OPINION AND ORDER
On August 23, 2017, the parties filed an Amended Motion to Remand under Sentence
Four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), wherein they request that
the Court remand the case for further proceedings and enter judgment. Doc. 18 (“Motion”). The
parties stipulate that:
On remand, the ALJ will conduct a new hearing; re-evaluate the record medical opinions;
reevaluate the claimant’s RFC; re-evaluate the claimant’s subjective symptom statements
under SSR 16-3p; and obtain additional vocational evidence as warranted.
Upon consideration of the parties’ Motion, the Court hereby grants the parties’ Motion,
remands the case for further proceedings consistent with the parties’ Motion, and enters
judgment in favor of Plaintiff.
Dated: August 25, 2017
Kathleen B. Burke
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?