Dodson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17 . The Court dismisses this matter, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 1/5/2018. (JLG)
PEARSON, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
AVRIL C. DODSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:17CV637
JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND
ORDER [Regarding ECF No. 17]
Pro Se Plaintiff Jeanette Darlene filed a Complaint in this matter, seeking judicial review
of the Social Security Administration’s denial of her claim for benefits. ECF No. 1. The Court
referred the case to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker for preparation of a Report and
Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1). Magistrate Judge
Parker submitted a Report, recommending that the Court dismiss the case for failure to prosecute.
ECF No. 17.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be
filed within 14 days after service. Plaintiff has not filed any objections, evidencing satisfaction
with the magistrate judge’s recommendations. Any further review by this Court would be a
duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813
(6th Cir. 1984), aff’d, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services,
932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
(1:17CV637)
Accordingly, the Court adopts the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. The
Court dismisses this matter, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 5, 2018
Date
/s/ Benita Y. Pearson
Benita Y. Pearson
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?