Flanders v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
Memorandum of Opinion and Order. The 15 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted. The Commissioner's final decision is affirmed, and the underlying matter is dismissed. Judge John R. Adams on 5/31/18. (S,HR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER M. FLANDERS,
Plaintiff,
-vsCOMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 1:17-cv-1333
JUDGE JOHN R. ADAMS
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
AND ORDER
The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff’s application for period of disability
and disability insurance benefits in the above-captioned case. Plaintiff sought judicial review of
the Commissioner’s decision, and the case was referred to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz, for
preparation of a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rules
72.2(b)(1).
The Magistrate Judge submitted a Report and Recommendation that the
Commissioner’s final decision be AFFIRMED.
Doc. 15.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) provides that the parties may object to a Report and Recommendation
within fourteen (14) days after service. To date, no objections have been filed. In fact, on May
29, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a response to the Report and Recommendation whereby the Plaintiff
confirmed that he would not file objections. As such, any further review by this Court would be a
duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813
(6th Cir. 1984); Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United
States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).
1
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby adopted.
The Commissioner’s final decision is AFFIRMED, and the underlying matter is DISMISSED in
its entirety with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 31, 2018
/s/ John R. Adams
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?