Simonis v. Johnson

Filing 11

Memorandum of Opinion and Order On 1/4/2018, (ECF No. 9), Pro Se Plaintiff James E. Simonis was ordered to file with the Clerk of Court on or before 1/25/2018 an appropriate application for entry of default and an appropriate motion, affidavit, and proposed order for default judgment, or show cause why the case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. ECF No. 9 . Although the due date has come and gone, Plaintiff has not sought additional time and has not filed either an application for entry of default or a motion, affidavit, and proposed order for default judgment. Accordingly, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. Furthermore, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 1/31/2018. (JLG)

Download PDF
PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JAMES E. SIMONIS, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER G. JOHNSON, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:17CV2071 JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this prisoner civil rights case was filed on October 2, 2017. In an entry dated January 4, 2018 (ECF No. 9), Pro Se Plaintiff James E. Simonis was ordered to file with the Clerk of Court on or before January 25, 2018 an appropriate application for entry of default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) and an appropriate motion, affidavit, and proposed order for default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) or show cause why the above-entitled case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Although the due date has come and gone, Plaintiff has not sought additional time and has not filed either an application for entry of default or a motion, affidavit, and proposed order for default judgment. Accordingly, this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution. (1:17CV2071) Furthermore, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED. January 31, 2018 Date /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?