Piotrowski v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Filing
13
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/18/23. The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Clay's R&R, and AFFIRMS the Commissioner's final decision. re 12 Report and Recommendation, 1 Complaint (T,A)
Case: 1:21-cv-02430-JG Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/18/23 1 of 2. PageID #: 1483
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
DENNIS PIOTROWSKI,
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CASE NO. 21-cv-2430
OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. 1]
JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
Plaintiff Dennis Piotrowski seeks judicial review of the Social Security
Administration Commissioner’s final decision denying his application for Disability
Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income.1
On December 7, 2022, Magistrate Judge Clay filed a Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) recommending that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s final decision.2 Defendant
did not file an objection to the R&R.
The Federal Magistrates Act requires district courts to conduct a de novo review
only of objected-to portions of an R&R.3 Absent objection, district courts may adopt an
R&R without review.4 Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the R&R and concurs in its
reasoning and result.
1
Doc. 1 at 1.
Doc. 12 at 1.
3
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
4
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–52 (1985). Failure to timely object may waive a party’s right to appeal the
district court’s order adopting the R&R. Id. at 155; United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949–50 (6th Cir. 1981).
2
Case: 1:21-cv-02430-JG Doc #: 13 Filed: 01/18/23 2 of 2. PageID #: 1484
Case No. 21-cv-2430
Gwin, J.
So, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Clay’s R&R, and AFFIRMS the
Commissioner’s final decision.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/
Dated: January 18, 2021
James S. Gwin
JAMES S. GWIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?