Doe v. SexSearch.com et al

Filing 142

ORDER. Phone Discovery Dispute conference held on the record 4/26/07. Pltf's motion for status conference to be held on the record was granted. Discovery dispute conference also held on the record. (Doc # 139 ); Defts' motions to dismiss on personal jurisdiction grounds (doc no. 113,117,118 & 123) are held in abeyance pending resolution of defts' Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss (doc #123). All previously authorized discovery is also held in abeyance, including outstanding subpoenas per outline. Pltf's Motion for Extension of Time 140 to respond to defts' motions to dismiss is granted. Opposition due 5/18/07; joint reply due 5/25/07. Signed by Judge Jack Zouhary on 4/27/07.(B,CJ)

Doe v. SexSearch.com et al

Doc. 142

Case 3:07-cv-00604-JZ

Document 142

Filed 04/27/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION John Doe, Plaintiff, -vsJUDGE JACK ZOUHARY SexSearch.com, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:07 CV 604 ORDER

The Court held a telephone discovery dispute conference, on the Record, on April 26, 2007. Attorneys present: Dean Boland and Brandie Hawkins for Plaintiff; William Adams, Michael Dortch, Gary Kaufman, Dana Milmeister, and Richard Kerger for Defendants. Plaintiff's Motion for Status Conference to be Held on the Record (Doc. No. 139) was granted, and the discovery dispute conference was held on the Record. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss on personal jurisdiction grounds (Doc. Nos. 113, 117, 118, and 123) are held in abeyance pending resolution of Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss on the merits (Doc. No. 123). All previously authorized (pre-planning-meeting )discovery is also held in abeyance, including all outstanding subpoenas. Plaintiff will notify all third parties who have been served with subpoenas that those subpoenas have been stayed and response is not required at this time. Further, Plaintiff's counsel will copy all defense counsel on that notification and, in the future, will notify third parties that any documents produced should also be provided to all interested counsel with each party to bear any copy costs.

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 3:07-cv-00604-JZ

Document 142

Filed 04/27/2007

Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motions to Dimiss [sic] (Doc. No. 140) is granted. Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition is due by May 18, 2007, and Defendants' Joint Reply is due by May 25, 2007. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Jack Zouhary JACK ZOUHARY U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2