Doe v. SexSearch.com et al

Filing 96

Attorney Appearance on behalf of Defendants Mauricio Bedoya and Patricia Quesada by Richard M. Kerger filed by on behalf of Experienced Internet.com, Inc.. (Kerger, Richard)

Download PDF
Doe v. SexSearch.com et al Doc. 96 Case 3:07-cv-00604-JZ Document 96 Filed 04/10/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION John Doe, Plaintiff, v. SexSearch.com, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:07CV604 Hon. Jack Zouhary ENTRY OF APPEARANCES Richard M. Kerger (0015864) KERGER & ASSOCIATES 33 S. Michigan Street, Suite 100 Toledo, Ohio 43604 Telephone: (419) 255-5990 Fax: (419) 255-5997 Gary Jay Kaufman (Pro hac vice) Dana Milmeister (Pro hac vice) The Kaufman Law Group 1925 Century Park East Suite 2350 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 286-2202 Fax: (310) 712-0023 Counsel for Specially Appearing Defendant Experienced Internet.com, Inc. Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-00604-JZ Document 96 Filed 04/10/2007 Page 2 of 2 Please take notice that the undersigned attorneys are entering special appearances on behalf of Defendants Mauricio Bedoya and Patricia Quesada. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Richard M. Kerger RICHARD M. KERGER (0015864) Counsel for Specially Appearing Defendants Experienced Internet.com, Inc., Mauricio Bedoya and Patricia Quesada /s/ Dana Milmeister Dana Milmeister (pro hac vice) Gary Jay Kaufman (pro hac vice) Counsel for Specially Appearing Defendants Experienced Internet.com, Inc., Mauricio Bedoya and Patricia Quesada CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been electronically filed this 10th day of April, 2007. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's System. /s/ Richard M. Kerger 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?