Tronsen v. Toledo-Lucas County Public Library
Filing
45
Acknowledgment from the USCA for Sixth Circuit of receipt of 43 Notice of Appeal (USCA# 08-3977). Date filed in USCA 8/13/08. (H, SP)
Tronsen v. Toledo-Lucas County Public Library
Doc. 45
Case 3:08-cv-00148-JGC Document 45
Filed 08/18/08 Page 1 of 1
TRANSMISSION FORM District Court NORTHERN OHIO, EASTERN DIVISION CAPTION ANDERS TRONSEN PLAINTIFF - APPELLANT v. TOLEDO-LUCAS COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY DEFENDANT - Appellee District Court No. USCA No. 08-3977 3:08cv148
CURRENT COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF NAME: Anders Tronsen FIRM NAME: ADDRESS: 2132 Glenwood Toledo, OH. 43620 TELEPHONE: 419-246-2791 CURRENT COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT NAME: John A. Borell, Sr. FIRM NAME: Prosecuting Attorney - Lucas Cnty ADDRESS: Suite 250 700 Adams Street Toledo, OH. 43624 TELEPHONE: 419-213-2001 ( ) granted ( ) denied ( ) pending
If Habeas Corpus, Certificate of Appealability is: Criminal Defendant: ( ) on bond
( ) incarcerated
( ) on probation (X) no ( ) not required (X) pending ( ) no
Fees: District Court & USCA Fee Paid: ( ) yes Pauper Status: ( ) granted ( ) denied Affidavit of Financial Status Filed: ( ) yes Counsel: ( ) appointed Carr ( ) yes (X) no ( ) retained (X) pro se
District Court Judge: Any hearing or trial FROM
Court Reporter: If yes, dates DATE
NONE
Shawn Harrigan
JULY 17, 2008
USE WHEN TRANSMITTING ANYTHING AFTER NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN SENT TO USCA Date Notice of Appeal sent to Court of Appeals The new information sent at this transmittal is and includes an updated copy of docket entries. I hereby certify that I have transmitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit the annexed documents consisting of volume(s) of pleadings, volume(s) of transcript and __volume(s) of depositions, which constitute the CERTIFIED RECORD ON APPEAL, day of , 2008. Clerk, GERI M. SMITH, U.S. District Court this
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?