Kaufmann v. Ohio Edison Company

Filing 45

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court adopts the R&R (Doc. No. 44) in its entirety. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) is granted. Judge Jack Zouhary on 12/29/10. (G,D)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Paul Kaufmann, Plaintiff, -vsJUDGE JACK ZOUHARY Ohio Edison Company, Defendant. Case No. 3:09 CV 2517 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 44). Under the relevant statute (28 U.S.C. § 636(C)): Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. In this case, no objections have been filed. The failure to file written objections constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the R&R. United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). The Court adopts the R&R (Doc. No. 44) in its entirety. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Jack Zouhary JACK ZOUHARY U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE December 29, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?