Lakhani v. Seneca County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 62

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation: After review, this Court adopts the R&R (Doc. No. 61 ) in its entirety, Defendants' Motion forSummary Judgment is granted (Doc. No. 39 ), all other Motions aredenied as moot, and this case is dismissed. (re 58 52 60 53 57 .) Judge Jack Zouhary on 7/19/11. (C,D) Modified on 7/19/2011 (C,D).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Alkarim P. Lakhani, Case No. 3:10 CV 11 Plaintiff, -vs- ORDER JUDGE JACK ZOUHARY Seneca County Sheriff’s Office, et al., Defendants. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Armstrong (Doc. No. 61). Under the relevant statute (28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)): Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. In this case, the fourteen-day period has elapsed and no objections have been filed. The failure to file written objections constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the R&R. United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). After review, this Court adopts the R&R (Doc. No. 61) in its entirety, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted (Doc. No. 39), all other Motions (Doc. Nos. 52–53, 57–58, and 60) are denied as moot, and this case is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Jack Zouhary JACK ZOUHARY U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE July 19, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?