Miller v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 19

Order Adopting 18 Report and Recommendation. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety. Judge Jack Zouhary on 3/10/2014. (D,L)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Timothy D. Miller,

Case No. 3:12 CV 3064
Plaintiff,

-vs-

ORDER
JUDGE JACK ZOUHARY

Commissioner Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge
filed February 19, 2014 (Doc. 18). The R&R recommends this Court affirm the Administrative Law
Judge’s decision and dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint with prejudice.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s
proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at
which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which
objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute
constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d
976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Plaintiff’s deadline for filing objections has passed, and no requests for extension have been
received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety.
Accordingly, this Court affirms the Administrative Law Judge’s decision and Plaintiff’s Complaint
is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Jack Zouhary
JACK ZOUHARY
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
March 10, 2014