Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
Order Adopting 18 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's deadline for filing objections has passed, and no requests for extension have been received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety. Accordingly, this Court affirms the final decision of the Commissioner and 1 Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Judge Jack Zouhary on 4/10/2014. (D,L)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Carrie Lucille Williams,
Case No. 3:13 CV 1276
JUDGE JACK ZOUHARY
Commissioner, Social Security Administration,
This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Magistrate Judge
filed March 19, 2014 (Doc. 18). The R&R recommends this Court affirm the final decision of the
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge’s
proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at
which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which
objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute
constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d
976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Plaintiff’s deadline for filing objections has passed, and no requests for extension have been
received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety.
Accordingly, this Court affirms the final decision of the Commissioner and Plaintiff’s Complaint is
dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Jack Zouhary
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
April 10, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?