Williams, et al. vs. Crosby, et al.
Filing
39
Order. Status Phone Conference held on 5/20/2014. This Court adopts those portions of the Magistrate Judge's Amended R&R 31 to which no party objected. As agreed during the phone status, Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant McD onough are dismissed without prejudice. The case schedule dates previously set are vacated (see Doc. 20 ). This Court will discuss a revised case schedule at the next phone status to be held after initial depositions are completed. Judge Jack Zouhary on 5/21/2014. (30 mins)(D,L)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Kathleen Williams, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
-vs-
Case No. 3:13 CV 2041
ORDER
JUDGE JACK ZOUHARY
Amanda Crosby, et al.,
Defendants.
This Court held a status phone conference on May 20, 2014.
Counsel present: Jeffrey Nunnari for Plaintiffs; Erin Moore for Defendants.
Plaintiffs may depose Defendant Amanda Crosby, and Defendants may depose Plaintiff
Kathleen Williams. After both depositions are scheduled, counsel shall contact this Court via e-mail
(zouhary_chambers@ohnd.uscourts.gov) to request a date for a further phone status.
This Court adopts those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s Amended Report &
Recommendation (“R&R”) to which no party objected (see Doc. 31 at 24). As agreed during the
phone status, Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant McDonough are dismissed without prejudice.
Defendants’ Objections to the R&R (Doc. 32) are denied without prejudice to renewal of the legal
arguments advanced in support of the Objection in an appropriate dispositive motion.
The case schedule dates previously set are vacated (see Doc. 20). This Court will discuss a
revised case schedule at the next phone status to be held after initial depositions are completed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Jack Zouhary
JACK ZOUHARY
U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
May 21, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?