Ward et al v. City of Norwalk et al
Filing
44
Judgment Entry (re 43 Order) Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. 37 , 38 ) be, and the same hereby are granted with regard to the plaintiffs' federal claims. I decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs' state-law claims. Judge James G. Carr on 12/9/14. (C,D)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Joshua D Ward, et al.,
Case No 3:13-cv-02210
Plaintiff,
v.
JUDGMENT ENTRY
City of Norwalk, et al.,
Defendants.
For the reasons stated in the Order filed December 9, 2014, it is hereby:
ORDERED defendants’ motions to dismiss (Docs. 37, 38) be, and the same
hereby are granted with regard to the plaintiffs’ federal claims. I decline to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ state-law claims.
So Ordered.
/s/ James G. Carr
Sr. United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
