Bruce v. Sheldon et al

Filing 26

Judgment Entry. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 11), is granted. Bruce's motions for a preliminary injunction, (Doc. No. 4 and Doc. No. 17), are denied. Bruce's motion to amend his complaint, (Doc. No. 3), and the Defendants' motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 8), are denied as moot. Bruce's complaint is dismissed for failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies. re 25 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 8/17/2015. (SG,D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Darrell W. Bruce, Case No. 3:14-cv-00834 Plaintiff v. JUDGMENT ENTRY Edward Sheldon, et al., Defendants For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously, the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 11), is granted. Bruce’s motions for a preliminary injunction, (Doc. No. 4 and Doc. No. 17), are denied. Bruce’s motion to amend his complaint, (Doc. No. 3), and the Defendants’ motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 8), are denied as moot. Bruce’s complaint is dismissed for failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies. s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?